Biorefinery based on sweet sorghum (15 posts)

← Group Forum   Group Forum Directory
  • Alessia Vecchiet said 4 years ago:

    The possibility in Europe of having a biorefinery for first generation bioethanol production using sweet sorghum should be considered if the size of the plant is of about 15,000 t/y of produced ethanol. Maybe this reality could be applicable in European Countries.
    For the supply of this plant could be sufficient 1200 hectars cultivated with sweet sorghum, and the sustainability could be possible if all the by-products ( e.g. residual bagasse after crushing for heat and power generation, residual vinasse after fermentation for biogas production, etc.) are fully exploited.
    For future developments, also the production of second generation ethanol from the residual bagasse of sorghum should be considered.

  • Eugenio Macchia said 4 years ago:

    Considering the model of 1,200 hectars, i think that a good size for the plant’s production capacity can be about 20,000 liters per day of fuel ethanol. This because i know from your data that agronomical yields and sugar contents in the feedstock can range, so we have to size the plant to the best conditions (that is, max value of incoming fermentable sugar) . Accordingly to my calculation 20,000 liters per day can stand the total amount of sugar coming from a crop of 1,200 hectars of sweet sorghum.

  • Alessia Vecchiet said 4 years ago:

    thanks for your suggestion! I agree with you!

  • Oscar Leòn said 4 years ago:

    Apart from the bioethanol and biogas production and power generation, the biorefinery concept must include other aspects, like the bioplastics production, for example. The problem is that if you include several products, the model could be difficult to be implemented by a farmer association, that could be a good option for this production scale. Of course, the biggest companies of bioethanol production are not going to implement a bioethanol plant lower than 100.000 or 150.000 m3 of bioethanol per year, so the concept of 20.000 L per day, could be applied to a maximum production of 6000 m3 per year. Great difference between them.
    In this case, we need to consider that maybe the only use of the raw material should be the production of power and bioethanol, nothing else.

  • Cecil Brewer said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    I recently spoke to the smallest refinery in Texas about their need for ethanol. Their production capacity is rated at 8.700 m3 per day. They use ~454 m3 per day; 165.710 m3 per year. They are open to the idea of purchasing small landowner (local) ethanol production. Spot price for last week was $1.50/gal ($0.3964/litre). Rack price was $1.74 ($0.459). The contract pull-through price will determine much of the viability for moving forward with our project. There are considerations for solid fuel (brickettes) and self-use fuel. Food or forage is minor given the vast array of other sources.
    As we progress in our production plans and feasibility, I will report our findings.

  • Roger Ford said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    We are looking for end-users in Kentucky. We are expanding our focus to include petroleum marketers/distributors. They can also avail themselves of the blenders credit from the federal government. We are also constructing a co-generation power plant as part of our project to produce electricity for the plant and heat for the fermentation process and selling the excess electricity through IPP agreements. We have a company that can assist with the construction of the power plant piece for those interested in JVs

  • Simona Fagioli said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    Cecil, the price of $ 0.459 per liter refers to the anhydrous ethanol (99.8% ethanol) or to the hydrated ethanol (95%) ?

  • Oscar Leòn said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    Dear Simona,
    if the use of bioethanol is for a Refinery, as said Cecil, they need bioethanol anhydrous, so I suppose that the price will be for this product.

  • Eugenio Macchia said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    Dear Cecil, have you some data about the price of sweet-sorghum in your Country ?

  • Cecil Brewer said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    A new article about USA”s stand on ethanol from the Wall Street Journal:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704679204575646860280389400.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

  • Cecil Brewer said 3 years, 11 months ago:

    Dear Eugenio, I see that my answer to your question is missing. Sorry. I must have made some mistake.
    Second try.
    We are in our infancy for this project and do not have firm costs. One problem we have is availability of seed. The universities seem to have much of the seed supply locked-up for their research and are not sharing for commercial ventures. This constraint has changed because there is now another source in Texas. I do not know the seed unit cost. It seems variety M81 seed is a good choice for our area. Our information at this stage is to expect 375 to 600 gallons per acre in East Texas (~3.500 to ~5.600 litres per hectare) of fuel ethanol at a juice distillation + refinement rate of 75% using a molecular sieve process. With this basis we will investigate the target margin we need. Seed cost will be one element. If December 2010’s contract price of $2.60 per gallon is the gross selling price (~ €0.51 per litre), then our basis cost needs to around $1.45 (€0.29) to make a sustainable profit.
    As a secondary product, we are considering making solid fuel briquettes from the waste bagasse and from waste wood sawdust with or without adding sorghum bagasse. We have a large amount of wood sawdust from railroad cross-ties and lumber mills in East Texas.
    To answer others, I am referring to anhydrous ethanol in my postings. We are expecting news soon about the tax subsidy for ethanol. It is currently $0.45 per gallon. Perhaps the brilliance of our politicians will carry the day in Congress (smile).

  • Denis Picco said 3 years, 8 months ago:

    3rd March, 2011
    Dear Cecil,
    I’m very interested in the opportunity to use the waste bagasse for the production of solid fuel briquettes. Which kind of market do you think are possible for this kind of product? Only for industrial uses (low price) or do you think is possible to reach also home uses (high price), as in small boilers?
    Have you some direct experiences in the use of these products, and about the related problems with ash management or emissions?
    In our test the use of sweet sorghum in small pellet boilers, with a no-high level of technology, gave not a good results.

  • Oscar Leòn said 3 years, 8 months ago:

    Dear Denis,

    the briquettes or pellets are focused mainly for using at small scale on small domestic boilers. The price is going to be higher than the biomass without densification, so its use is not focused for industrial production.
    About the ash or emissions, the problems are going to be similar to the use of bagasse, but the advantage of the densification is that you can mix this biomass with others to improve the results.

    Could be interesting try to make a test between several companies to evaluate the result in different conditions. For example, we have in CARTIF three different biomass boilers and a pellet production plant.

    Apart from this, we need to think about the new European normative for Agripellets, different from the DIN Plus normative for pellets. In this case, if the bagasse pellets are into the range of this norm, could be other market for sweet sorghum.

  • ppardo said 3 years, 5 months ago:

    Dear all,

    I’m new in the comunity/forum,
    I’m a sorghum breeder and i’m working in a seed company that have the sorghum as “core crop”.
    Since 2009 we are heading the sweet sorghum international breeding program with specific aplication in ethanol production. this was an interesting way to change the plant idiotype for this use. you must think that all the sorghum varieties and hibrids were developed for animal feed.
    Just as my contribution want to offer seeds samples to try on diferent environments and to know the real potential of this specie.
    we achieved excellent results of production in micro and macro plots trials conduced in North of Argentina (sub-tropical environment), central Argentina (template environment), South of Brazil and South of US (Hereford).
    Please, be free to ask for samples and I’m available to comments about of technology package developed for this specific use. we have hard data generaated on the last seasons.

  • Luca Venturini said 3 years, 5 months ago:

    Dear Guys
    I’m working in a new company and we are selling a product for sorghum. It increse the growing of root of about 700%, water absorption, and increase the production of grain by 30%.
    Maybe someone of you know the azospirillum. Our product contain 2*10^9 CFU if azospirillum and the expiry date is of 2 year.
    Our product is one of the best of the world in matter of quality and duration. We have the iso 9001 certificate and For sorghum only 200g of product can mixed with 50Kg of seeds. But the pricipal benefit is to forget the use of nitrogen.
    If you want know more contact me
    [email protected] ,
    I’ll glad to answer you and maybe send 3/4 package.